|
[FYI] Plan 2.0 uploaded as md files to our repo
Team – THANK YOU for all the amazing collab so far. Due to all of YOUR hard work we have reached the next milestone of our efforts – we are now ready to start fleshing out the skeleton of our plan(1), adding details, and honestly estimating resources and timelines!! We are also now ready to start accepting PRs/issues now that the plan is in git. Happy typing (and patches are welcome to help correct any md formatting across the 3 plan files)!
To that end, we’ve collected volunteers to help us break into smaller focus groups, iterate through the plan(1), and come back to present their work/request larger group’s approval/help:
As we enter this next phase, ALL ARE WELCOME to join the focus groups, and our intent is that by zeroing in on a more precise problem set we’ll be able to increase our velocity in prepare the final plan that will be presented to the TAC and GB.
As we coordinate small group meeting times/details, I’ll talk to each section leader to talk about what we want content/formatting-wise from each group to deliver back to the team, but here is where our analysis and detail work will come into play, so please continue the excellent collaboration we’ve had to date.
Great job all, I’m looking forward to shaping our final deliverables with you all. Thank you!
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[RFC] Cross-Foundation Glossary of terms
Hello TAC. The Education SIG(1) would like to propose the creation of a common lexicon for terms and definitions that would be used throughout OSSF work and materials (if one does not already exist in either the OSSF or larger LF). We’d like the TAC’s assistance in soliciting contributions from across the working groups to contribute specific terminology that may exist in our respective areas (e.g. supply chain-specific terms, tooling/development-specific words, etc.) so that we have one all-inclusive set of artifacts we all can reference that establish how WE ALL are using this terminology so that internal and external collaborators understand what we are trying to convey in a given interaction.
We plan on leveraging existing definitions from such sources as NIST, ISO, or other recognized security or open source community bodies as the basis of such work wherever possible, and then augmenting as needed for our specific OSSF-usecases. We’d love your thoughts and suggestions on this initiative. Thanks for your time and feedback.
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[FYI] Meeting Time changes have been made
All – with the assistance of the inestimable Jory Burson, we’ve official adjusted our meeting times to the following:
Everyone is welcome to all calls, meetings will be recorded for those that can not attend and updates will be shared at each Full SIG call. You can see all the foundation meetings in the community calendar(1). VERY excited to be accelerating our work and getting the plan revised so we can start to being our good work for the community! Thanks all.
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[FYI] No Full EDU.SIG Call 14September /eom
$SUBJECT
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[FYI] No EDU SIG Section One Call Sept 15
Dave Russo
Due to OpenSSF week activities we will not have the Section One EDU SIG call on Thursday Sept 15.
Thanks! Dave -- Dave Russo Principal Program Manager, Secure Development Red Hat Product Security |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[RFC] Cross-Foundation Glossary of terms
Regarding a glossary (lexicon?!):
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
The NIST Computer Security Resource Center (NSRC) Glossary <https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary> might be useful to look at. They only list various definitions along with their sources. An important limitation of this glossary is that they *only* list definitions from US Federal Information Processing Standards (FIPS), various final NIST documents, and the Committee on National Security Systems (CNSS) Instruction CNSSI-4009. That said, it's a decent place to look for sourced definitions. A good example of what it's like is the entry on "vulnerability": https://csrc.nist.gov/glossary/term/vulnerability Notice how easy it is to have a URL that jumps directly to a definition. I think that's a key necessary feature. You can have separate pages, or one page with named anchors (where the term is the name of the anchor), but I think that's valuable. Some other sources: * NIST IR 7298 "Glossary of Key Information Security Terms" - https://csrc.nist.gov/publications/detail/nistir/7298/rev-3/final * SANS - https://www.sans.org/security-resources/glossary-of-terms/ * CISA - https://niccs.cisa.gov/cybersecurity-career-resources/glossary I think you want to use the term "glossary" not "lexicon" (NIST uses the term "glossary"). A lexicon is often considered just a list of words, NOT necessarily including any definitions <https://dictionary.cambridge.org/us/dictionary/english/lexicon> In contrast, <https://www.google.com/search?q=define+glossary>: "A glossary is a list of an alphabetical list of terms or words found in or relating to a specific subject, text, or dialect, with explanations; a brief dictionary". Note that all the sources I cited above use the term "glossary". Also: if there's going to be a lexicon/glossary, maybe it should be moved to the Best Practices WG or similar, not just within the Education SIG. That might give it more visibility. Obviously definitions aren't limited to education :-). But if others think it should be within the education SIG that's fine. --- David A. Wheeler On Aug 31, 2022, at 10:02 AM, CRob Robinson (Intel) <christopher.robinson@...> wrote: |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
Brian Behlendorf
Thought people here might find this of interest. Probably worth multiple responses rather than a SIG-coordinated one, but perhaps worth discussing how a response to this might connect with the goals of this SIG. Brian ---------- Forwarded message
---------
From: Tortora, Paul J. EOP/NCD <Paul.J.Tortora@...> Date: Wed, Oct 5, 2022 at 5:48 AM Subject: Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations To: Cc: Stewart Gloster, Camille A. EOP/NCD <Camille.A.Stewart@...>, Nielsen, Suzanne C. EOP/NCD <Suzanne.C.Nielsen@...> Dear Colleagues: As many of you know, the Office of the National Cyber Director is in the initial stages of a collaborative development of a new National Strategy on Cyber Workforce and Education. As part of our wide-reaching plan and in order to gather as much information, ideas, and recommendations for this to be a successful effort, we are seeking best practice insights, ideas, and inputs from stakeholders in the private sector, non-profit organizations, academic institutions, and government in the following areas:
I. Cyber Workforce: Recruitment, Hiring, Career Development, Reskilling, Retention, Statistics & Data II. Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA): In the Workforce, and in Training, Education, and Awareness Efforts III. Training, Education, Awareness: Training, Higher Education, K-12 Education, General Cybersecurity education, digital awareness and online safety To reach as much of the nation as possible, we are casting a wide net through a publicly available Request for Information ( Office of the National Cyber Director Requests Your Insight and Expertise on Cyber Workforce, Training, and Education - The White House), and we would welcome your thoughts and experiences on this topic, as well as those from within your organization to provide us with impactful insights and recommendations to share in any of the above or related areas. We want to ensure that we hear from as many voices as possible as we move forward, so should you or your staff have any questions, please feel free to share them with me or Suzanne Nielsen, Director, National Workforce and Education Strategy (suzanne.c.nielsen@... ), and our team will follow up with you as soon as possible. Thank you for your involvement and partnership,
Sincerely,
Paul
Paul J. Tortora Office of the National Cyber Director Executive Office of the President C: 202-881-9625
Jim Zemlin
Executive Director, The Linux Foundation |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
Thanks for sharing Brian! I think this would be something most excellent for the group to have some thoughts on! Do you have a deadline when you’d like comments back to you (I am assuming you’ll be collecting for the OSSF)?
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
From: openssf-sig-education@... <openssf-sig-education@...>
On Behalf Of Brian Behlendorf
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 4:15 AM To: openssf-sig-education@... Subject: [openssf-sig-education] Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
Thought people here might find this of interest. Probably worth multiple responses rather than a SIG-coordinated one, but perhaps worth discussing how a response to this might connect with the goals of this SIG. Brian
---------- Forwarded message ---------
Dear Colleagues: As many of you know, the Office of the National Cyber Director is in the initial stages of a collaborative development of a new National Strategy on Cyber Workforce and Education. As part of our wide-reaching plan and in order to gather as much information, ideas, and recommendations for this to be a successful effort, we are seeking best practice insights, ideas, and inputs from stakeholders in the private sector, non-profit organizations, academic institutions, and government in the following areas:
I. Cyber Workforce: Recruitment, Hiring, Career Development, Reskilling, Retention, Statistics & Data II. Diversity, Equity, Inclusion, and Accessibility (DEIA): In the Workforce, and in Training, Education, and Awareness Efforts III. Training, Education, Awareness: Training, Higher Education, K-12 Education, General Cybersecurity education, digital awareness and online safety To reach as much of the nation as possible, we are casting a wide net through a publicly available Request for Information ( Office of the National Cyber Director Requests Your Insight and Expertise on Cyber Workforce, Training, and Education - The White House), and we would welcome your thoughts and experiences on this topic, as well as those from within your organization to provide us with impactful insights and recommendations to share in any of the above or related areas. We want to ensure that we hear from as many voices as possible as we move forward, so should you or your staff have any questions, please feel free to share them with me or Suzanne Nielsen, Director, National Workforce and Education Strategy (suzanne.c.nielsen@... ), and our team will follow up with you as soon as possible. Thank you for your involvement and partnership,
Sincerely,
Paul
Paul J. Tortora Office of the National Cyber Director Executive Office of the President C: 202-881-9625
-- Jim Zemlin
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
Brian Behlendorf
If this group wants to develop a
response, I can send it into the RFI on OpenSSF letterhead, but
I'll need a week to get legal review on our side (among other
reasons so we stay clear of "lobbying"). It's not going to take a
week's worth of work to review, but I don't control the queue of
items through the LF's legal team, so a week is my safe estimate
of how long that'll take assuming a couple of pages of response
plus work any changes with the SIG. I also can't commit OpenSSF
staff time to collate/organize/make sense of individual responses
into a unified one - it needs to be someone here who can be the
editor.
Brian
On 10/11/22 05:46, Robinson,
Christopher wrote:
-- Brian Behlendorf General Manager, Open Source Security Foundation bbehlendorf@... Twitter: @brianbehlendorf |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
David and I chatted after the BEST working group call today. He and I and many in the group see a lot of value in contributing here. To that end I created this strawman draft(1) for the group to massage and contribute to if we want one response from the SIG. It would be useful to get some guidance on how we want to position the response (is this a list of what we’re doing? Is this a list of proposed contributions to their effort? Is this an invitation for their contributions? Etc.). I know that my company will also be working up a response from their perspective that may touch on the SIG’s efforts, but ultimately be tailored to their interactions with the NCD to date and ongoing.
We’re VERY excited about this opportunity and I welcome the SIG (and other members) to help us craft a most excellent response. I’m glad to help steer this and get it prepped for your side’s legal review. TEAM – please get your thoughts/suggestions/additions/removals/comments in before 16October so we can give the LF team time to do their review.
Thank you all!
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
From: openssf-sig-education@... <openssf-sig-education@...>
On Behalf Of Brian Behlendorf
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 11:01 AM To: Robinson, Christopher <christopher.robinson@...> Cc: openssf-sig-education@... Subject: Re: [openssf-sig-education] Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
If this group wants to develop a response, I can send it into the RFI on OpenSSF letterhead, but I'll need a week to get legal review on our side (among other reasons so we stay clear of "lobbying"). It's not going to take a week's worth of work to review, but I don't control the queue of items through the LF's legal team, so a week is my safe estimate of how long that'll take assuming a couple of pages of response plus work any changes with the SIG. I also can't commit OpenSSF staff time to collate/organize/make sense of individual responses into a unified one - it needs to be someone here who can be the editor.
Brian
On 10/11/22 05:46, Robinson, Christopher wrote:
-- Brian Behlendorf General Manager, Open Source Security Foundation bbehlendorf@... Twitter: @brianbehlendorf |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
eric.tice@...
We should discuss this in the Education SIG expand content meeting also?
Respectfully,
From:
Robinson, Christopher <christopher.robinson@...> CAUTION:This email is received from an external domain. Open the hyperlink(s) & attachment(s) with caution.
David and I chatted after the BEST working group call today. He and I and many in the group see a lot of value in contributing here. To that end I created this strawman draft(1) for the group to massage and contribute to if we want one response from the SIG. It would be useful to get some guidance on how we want to position the response (is this a list of what we’re doing? Is this a list of proposed contributions to their effort? Is this an invitation for their contributions? Etc.). I know that my company will also be working up a response from their perspective that may touch on the SIG’s efforts, but ultimately be tailored to their interactions with the NCD to date and ongoing.
We’re VERY excited about this opportunity and I welcome the SIG (and other members) to help us craft a most excellent response. I’m glad to help steer this and get it prepped for your side’s legal review. TEAM – please get your thoughts/suggestions/additions/removals/comments in before 16October so we can give the LF team time to do their review.
Thank you all!
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
From: openssf-sig-education@... <openssf-sig-education@...>
On Behalf Of Brian Behlendorf
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 11:01 AM To: Robinson, Christopher <christopher.robinson@...> Cc: openssf-sig-education@... Subject: Re: [openssf-sig-education] Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
If this group wants to develop a response, I can send it into the RFI on OpenSSF letterhead, but I'll need a week to get legal review on our side (among other reasons so we stay clear of "lobbying"). It's not going to take a week's worth of work to review, but I don't control the queue of items through the LF's legal team, so a week is my safe estimate of how long that'll take assuming a couple of pages of response plus work any changes with the SIG. I also can't commit OpenSSF staff time to collate/organize/make sense of individual responses into a unified one - it needs to be someone here who can be the editor.
Brian
On 10/11/22 05:46, Robinson, Christopher wrote:
-- Brian Behlendorf General Manager, Open Source Security Foundation bbehlendorf@... Twitter: @brianbehlendorf
Internal to Wipro |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
Sounds like a great suggestion
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
From: openssf-sig-education@... <openssf-sig-education@...>
On Behalf Of eric.tice via lists.openssf.org
Sent: Tuesday, October 11, 2022 11:44 AM To: Robinson, Christopher <christopher.robinson@...>; openssf-sig-education@...; bbehlendorf@...; David A. Wheeler <dwheeler@...> Cc: Arnaud Le Hors <lehors@...>; daniel.appelquist@... Subject: Re: [openssf-sig-education] Office of the National Cyber Director - RFI for ideas, inputs, and recommendations
We should discuss this in the Education SIG expand content meeting also?
Respectfully,
From:
Robinson, Christopher <christopher.robinson@...> CAUTION:This email is received from an external domain. Open the hyperlink(s) & attachment(s) with caution.
David and I chatted after the BEST working group call today. He and I and many in the group see a lot of value in contributing here. To that end I created this strawman draft(1) for the group to massage and contribute to if we want one response from the SIG. It would be useful to get some guidance on how we want to position the response (is this a list of what we’re doing? Is this a list of proposed contributions to their effort? Is this an invitation for their contributions? Etc.). I know that my company will also be working up a response from their perspective that may touch on the SIG’s efforts, but ultimately be tailored to their interactions with the NCD to date and ongoing.
We’re VERY excited about this opportunity and I welcome the SIG (and other members) to help us craft a most excellent response. I’m glad to help steer this and get it prepped for your side’s legal review. TEAM – please get your thoughts/suggestions/additions/removals/comments in before 16October so we can give the LF team time to do their review.
Thank you all!
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
From:
openssf-sig-education@... <openssf-sig-education@...>
On Behalf Of Brian Behlendorf
If this group wants to develop a response, I can send it into the RFI on OpenSSF letterhead, but I'll need a week to get legal review on our side (among other reasons so we stay clear of "lobbying"). It's not going to take a week's worth of work to review, but I don't control the queue of items through the LF's legal team, so a week is my safe estimate of how long that'll take assuming a couple of pages of response plus work any changes with the SIG. I also can't commit OpenSSF staff time to collate/organize/make sense of individual responses into a unified one - it needs to be someone here who can be the editor.
Brian
On 10/11/22 05:46, Robinson, Christopher wrote:
-- Brian Behlendorf General Manager, Open Source Security Foundation bbehlendorf@... Twitter: @brianbehlendorf
'The information contained in this electronic message and any attachments to this message are intended for the exclusive use of the addressee(s) and may contain proprietary, confidential or privileged information. If you are not the intended recipient, you should not disseminate, distribute or copy this e-mail. Please notify the sender immediately and destroy all copies of this message and any attachments. WARNING: Computer viruses can be transmitted via email. The recipient should check this email and any attachments for the presence of viruses. The company accepts no liability for any damage caused by any virus transmitted by this email. www.wipro.com' Internal to Wipro |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Education Materials Organization - Spreadsheet Working Meeting
Dave Russo
One of the deliverables that the Create &
Curate Content [1] section of the EDU SIG is finalizing is a
method for organizing the education materials the SIG will be
working with. We are using this spreadsheet [2] as a working
document to determine the categories and values that will be used
for this purpose.
There are multiple dependencies for this information across all three sections, so we intend to finalize this by 21 Oct. All spreadsheet feedback and suggestions due by 18 Oct and we will discuss this at the 19 Oct EDU SIG meeting, with the expectation for finalizing v1.0 by 21 Oct. To help facilitate this effort I am scheduling a working meeting for Tuesday Oct 18 @ 10:00am EDT. Anyone interested in contributing to this effort is encouraged to join the call if able. I'm not sure we will get this on the OSSF calendar in time, the Zoom link to join is: https://zoom.us/j/93408997717?pwd=MlBTTERFV0FxUmlEWXhlVkJCNkFVdz09 Thanks, Dave [1] https://docs.google.com/document/d/1bNAUPTTwFbffulI0h5Oiakq7CfP1tuIlmDcjNMG0XR4/edit?usp=sharing [2] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14g7jdt-e-AV1aeFFDKpPkyUh3ljPhC2kalaojMurqBU/edit#gid=0 -- Dave Russo Senior Principal Program Manager, Secure Development Red Hat Product Security |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Invitation: Materials Matrix Spreadsheet @ Thu Oct 20, 2022 9am - 10am (EDT) (openssf-sig-education@lists.openssf.org)
Dave Russo
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Education Materials Organization Spreadsheet Complete
Dave Russo
FYI,
The initial version of the Educational Materials Matrix [1] has been completed and is available to accept data. The intention for this spreadsheet is to have a definitive centralized list of the existing secure development educational materials that the Education SIG intends to use in pursuit of our objectives. We have defined a number of categories that will help us understand what each artifact provides and assist with creating curricula, defining gaps, acquiring and creating new content and planning for engaging and incentivizing the open source community. To add an item to the spreadsheet, please provide the following in the Matrix tab: - Title of the artifact, hyperlinked to its location - Content Type - selected from the drop-down list - Check all Domains that apply to the artifact (these are intended to be general, see the Domain Mapping tab for examples) - Check all Personas that apply to the artifact (the types of learner that would benefit from the content) - Check all Learner Levels that apply to the artifact - Stack / Language - selected from the drop-down list - The date of the submission in the Last Updated column - The name (and e-mail) of the person who submitted the artifact in the Submitted By column Suggestions for changes to the spreadsheet and categories should be submitted by creating an issue in the SIG repo [2]. Thanks to everyone that contributed, especially those who met during our working session yesterday to get things wrapped up! Dave [1] https://docs.google.com/spreadsheets/d/14g7jdt-e-AV1aeFFDKpPkyUh3ljPhC2kalaojMurqBU/edit?usp=sharing [2] https://github.com/ossf/education/issues -- Dave Russo Senior Principal Program Manager, Secure Development Red Hat Product Security |
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[RFC] - Request for any notes on EDU.SIG plan
EDU.SIG - as we near completion of the revised plan, I invite EVERYONE to give it a last read/re-read to ensure it makes sense and we're not missing any obvious gaps. As each section wraps up I'll be ensuring the formatting/wording is consistent as well as collecting all resource needs into a summary page. I'll send an official RFC out once that happens, but we'd love to get any gaps or questions addressed ASAP - https://github.com/ossf/education/tree/main/plan
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[RFC] EDU.SIG Plan ready for review & comment - DUE 23Dec2022
EDU.SIG & BEST WG members – the EDU.SIG has completed our work on the next draft of the Education plan that we desire to share with the TAC in early 2023. Please take some time and read through the plan(1) and provide any feedback you may have(2). If you have corrections or desired changes to the wording, please submit a PR. We’d like to have this feedback no later than 23Dec2022 so that we can begin the process of sharing with the TAC and GB. Thanks to everyone that helped us get this far, great work! I’m really looking forward to collaborating on the next stages of our efforts here!
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
[FYI] New EDU.SIG DEI Subcommittee
Team – we’ve had numerous members express interest in devoting time to collaborating specifically on our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion goals for the SIG. If you wish to join in the conversation and help us further these important components of our plan, please join us on Slack(1), our mailing list(2), and sign up to join the kick-off call chaired by our very own Christine(3)! We’d LOVE to get this group kickstarted before the end of 2022 so we can hit the ground running on achieving our goals early in 2023! Thanks for your consideration and support!
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: [FYI] New EDU.SIG DEI Subcommittee
Christine Abernathy (F5 Networks)
Hi
Happy to see this get started. A quick clarification, Jay White and I will be co-chairs.
Thanks Christine
--
From:
openssf-sig-education-dei@... <openssf-sig-education-dei@...> on behalf of CRob Robinson <christopher.robinson@...> EXTERNAL MAIL: bounce+112097+1+6791241+11891681@... Team – we’ve had numerous members express interest in devoting time to collaborating specifically on our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion goals for the SIG. If you wish to join in the conversation and help us further these important components of our plan, please join us on Slack(1), our mailing list(2), and sign up to join the kick-off call chaired by our very own Christine(3)! We’d LOVE to get this group kickstarted before the end of 2022 so we can hit the ground running on achieving our goals early in 2023! Thanks for your consideration and support!
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
|
||||||||||||
|
|
||||||||||||
|
Re: [FYI] New EDU.SIG DEI Subcommittee
Exciting times, Team!
toggle quoted message
Show quoted text
I believe we were all good with the 8-9 am (I'm assuming PST) time frame for today.
I may have gotten my selection in too late. Let me know if I need to choose another time.
Jay White
From: openssf-sig-education-dei@... <openssf-sig-education-dei@...> on behalf of Christine Abernathy via lists.openssf.org
<c.abernathy=f5.com@...>
Sent: Wednesday, December 14, 2022 1:45:24 PM To: CRob Robinson <christopher.robinson@...>; openssf-sig-education@... <openssf-sig-education@...>; openssf-sig-education-dei@... <openssf-sig-education-dei@...> Cc: openssf-wg-best-practices@... <openssf-wg-best-practices@...>; yyser@... <yyser@...> Subject: [EXTERNAL] Re: [openssf-sig-education-dei] [FYI] New EDU.SIG DEI Subcommittee
Hi
Happy to see this get started. A quick clarification, Jay White and I will be co-chairs.
Thanks Christine
--
From:
openssf-sig-education-dei@... <openssf-sig-education-dei@...> on behalf of CRob Robinson <christopher.robinson@...> EXTERNAL MAIL: bounce+112097+1+6791241+11891681@... Team – we’ve had numerous members express interest in devoting time to collaborating specifically on our Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion goals for the SIG. If you wish to join in the conversation and help us further these important components of our plan, please join us on Slack(1), our mailing list(2), and sign up to join the kick-off call chaired by our very own Christine(3)! We’d LOVE to get this group kickstarted before the end of 2022 so we can hit the ground running on achieving our goals early in 2023! Thanks for your consideration and support!
Cheers,
CRob Director of Security Communications Intel Product Assurance and Security
|
||||||||||||
|
|
| 1 - 20 of 34 |